Contact Us
Terrorism
Natural Disaster, Pandemic, SNS, CRI Exercises
Discussion Based
Operations Based
Topics / Types
Evaluation
Past Performance


Prevention Exercises
The importance of prevention is made clear in the executive summary of the National Strategy for Homeland Security. The strategic objectives of homeland security in order of priority are to:

Prevent terrorist attacks within the United States
Reduce U.S. vulnerability to terrorism
Minimize damage and facilitate recovery from attacks that may occur

State and local jurisdictions should try to incorporate as many preventive exercises into their programs as possible. These exercises can be either discussion or operations based and may focus on issues pertaining to:

Information and intelligence sharing
Credible threats
Surveillance
Opposing/adversary force or "red team" activity (described below)

The National Strategy for Homeland Security identifies a requirement to employ red team techniques to practice detecting terrorist activity before it manifests itself in an attack, with a goal of allowing proper preemptive, preventive, and protective actions to be taken. The red team mission is to apply knowledge of terrorists' motivations, organization, targeting, tactics, techniques, procedures, weapons, and equipment and assess Federal, State, and local governments' ability to deter, detect, and defend against and defeat terrorist attacks.

DHS/ODP employs strategic and tactical red team techniques in the National Exercise Program (NEP) and has targeted resources avail-able to provide such an enhancement to specific State and local exercises conducted in accordance with HSEEP. States will be able to request an opportunity to employ a red team and/or universal adversary force in their State and local exercises. Such requests will be considered and granted based both on the availability of resources and scheduling and on the State's level of demonstrated exercise competency.


Response & Recovery Exercises
Although the prevention and deterrence of attacks are paramount, it remains probable that incidents will occur. Therefore, exercises should also include the response and recovery aspects of an event in addition to prevention. Response and recovery issues in an exercise may include notification, communication, command and control, remediation, return to normalcy, and continuity of government and business.


Interagency / Interjurisdictional Exercises
Because the prevention of and/or response to a crisis situation will require resources and expertise from various agencies and disciplines throughout the Federal, State, and local government structures, an exercise should assess the capacity of multiple organizations and the effectiveness of interagency cooperation and inter-operable communication. The organizations involved in an exercise may be public or private, from any level of government, and from disciplines ranging from public health to fire, as long as they reflect the type of exercise and scenario. Jurisdictions that would rely heavily on mutual aid assistance for response should include participants from the agencies with which they have agreements and compacts. It is also beneficial to conduct regional exercises that include participants from multiple agencies and jurisdictions, because such a scenario would likely reflect actual response to an event.


Private-Sector Coordination Exercises
Exercise scenarios mimic actual response to the greatest extent possible; therefore, local and State government agencies are encouraged to incorporate the private sector. The range of terrorist targets is not limited to civilian populations or government facilities. The private sector can be a target of terrorism because it is often viewed as a symbol of American economic, social, and military power or as an extension of the U.S. Government. The private sector includes commercial, business, and industrial facilities, tourist attractions, and special events. It also includes the personnel, source material (if a production entity), and support systems (for example, transportation capabilities) of such entities.

Private-sector preparedness and response activities often mirror those of the surrounding communities. Recognizing this need, DHS/ODP supports States' efforts to incorporate major community businesses and facilities into their SHSEEPs. For example, in one realistic scenario, a California community held its chemical FSE at a major industrial plant and used plant employees as victim actors. Another example of private-sector involvement is the DHS/ODP initiative to exercise the evacuation plans of Major League Baseball stadiums.

Private response capabilities, such as fire brigades, security forces, and medical staff, can augment local response capabilities and remove a significant burden from limited local resources during critical situations. In a real incident, these resources and activities should be available for mutual aid, and they should be exercised as such. Other examples of exercise contributions available from private industry include railroad lines, factory and other facilities, personal protective equipment (PPE), hazardous materials (HazMat) control and other content expertise, and personnel to serve as controllers, evaluators, or logistical support. Furthermore, in a real incident, private industry would be included in the Incident Command System (ICS) structure in the form of public works, hospitals, and other response entities.


Regional / International Exercises
Participation in regional and international exercises is a crucial aspect of emergency prepared-ness for many communities across the country. From Seattle and Vancouver to San Diego and Tijuana, communities need to plan with their neighbors for emergencies that cross State or national borders. Terrorist incidents do not stop at political borders, and neither should preparedness activities. Interstate and international resources should be incorporated into plans and used as appropriate. In some locales, such as in the Pacific Islands, international assistance is the closest available mutual aid. Communities should familiarize themselves with the resources available from potential regional and international partners and share their response concepts and standard/emergency operating procedures (SOPs/EOPs) with these groups.

DHS/ODP supports regional planning and exercise efforts and has conducted exercises with numerous international partners. The Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) grant program requires the formation of an Urban Area Working Group (UAWG) to collaborate on assessment and planning for urban areas and their surrounding communities and stakeholders; thus, many related exercises will be conducted on the regional level. During the Top Officials (TOPOFF 2) National Exercise Series, Canadian agencies participated as if real-world incidents had occurred in Seattle or Chicago. Plans to involve international partners in future national exercises and bordering State-sponsored exercises are currently in review.
Copyright © 2005 Critical Incident Solutions, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.